Funny Fridays: Because It’s Better to Laugh than to Cry!

6 Responses to “Funny Fridays: Because It’s Better to Laugh than to Cry!”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

1. SpaceAgeSage -- Lori

   January 30, 2009 at 9:16 am

   Yep, that sounded like Garfield.

   You know “diet” is the word “die” with a “t” at the end, right? No wonder we often avoid it! I prefer “dietary changes.” It sound much easier.
2. Linda Abbit

   January 30, 2009 at 7:42 pm

   Hi SpaceAgeSage Lori,

   I like your expression “dietary changes” better, too! Thanks for sharing it here.
3. rummuser

   January 31, 2009 at 8:09 am

   That was a welcome change from the earlier post! Here is something to think about and laugh at as well. The letter is about subsidies doled out by the British Government.

   Dear Secretary of State,

   My friend, who is in farming at the moment, recently received a cheque for £3,000 from the Rural Payments Agency for not rearing pigs. I would now like to join the “not rearing pigs” business.

   In your opinion, what is the best kind of farm not to rear pigs on, and which is the best breed of pigs not to rear? I want to be sure I approach this endeavour in keeping with all government policies, as dictated by the EU under the Common Agricultural Policy.

   I would prefer not to rear bacon pigs, but if this is not the type you want not rearing, I will just as gladly not rear porkers. Are there any advantages in not rearing rare breeds such as Saddlebacks or Gloucester Old Spots, or are there too many people already not rearing these?

   As I see it, the hardest part of this programme will be keeping an accurate record of how many pigs I haven’t reared. Are there any Government or Local Authority courses on this?

   My friend is very satisfied with this business. He has been rearing pigs for forty years or so, and the best he ever made on them was £1,422 in 1968. That is – until this year, when he received a cheque for not rearing any.

   If I get £3,000 for not rearing 50 pigs, will I get £6,000 for not rearing 100?

   I plan to operate on a small scale at first, holding myself down to about 4,000 pigs not raised, which will mean about £240,000 for the first year. As I become more expert in not rearing pigs, I plan to be more ambitious, perhaps increasing to, say, 40,000 pigs not reared in my second year, for which I should expect about £2.4 million from your department. Incidentally, I wonder if I would be eligible to receive tradable carbon credits for all these pigs not producing harmful and polluting methane gases?

   Another point: These pigs that I plan not to rear will not eat 2,000 tonnes of cereals. I understand that you also pay farmers for not growing crops. Will I qualify for payments for not growing cereals to not feed the pigs I don’t rear?

   I am also considering the “not milking cows” business, so please send any information you have on that too. Please could you also include the current Defra advice on set aside fields? Can this be done on an e-commerce basis with virtual fields (of which I seem to have several thousand hectares)?

   In view of the above you will realise that I will be totally unemployed, and will therefore qualify for unemployment benefits.

   I shall of course be voting for your party at the next general election.

   Yours faithfully,

   XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX
4. Linda Abbit

   January 31, 2009 at 9:41 pm

   Hi rummuser,

   Thanks for “not sharing” the above joke with us. It is quite a brain teaser — love it!
5. Davina

   February 2, 2009 at 4:37 pm

   Hi Linda. Sorry I’m late for comedy hour I’ve been away for the past 3 days. I like that Exercise for Real Life — a truthful, and realistic workout. Sounds like something I could manage.
6. Linda Abbit

   February 2, 2009 at 7:35 pm

   Hi Davina,

   Thanks for being such a loyal TLeC reader! Hope you had a great long weekend away and you went somewhere fun! I’m also an enthusiast of the Real Life Exercise plan.

Leave A Comment...

Click here to cancel reply.

Name *

E-mail *

Website